Rachael Maddow demonizes inquiry not government approved

Rachael Maddow is Jewish. She has a prime time spot on MSNBC. Do you really think someone as connected as her could be willfully blind as to the issues of both these false flag operations? Of course, she, at a minimum, if she were intellectually honest, would have to acknowledge serious problems and give fair witness to those folks bringing  the questions to the table

The fact that she doesn't and she acts out her wrath so convincingly in front of folks blindly trusting her integrity, demonstrates her total lack of respect for common people, especially , non-Jews. The Jewish playbook, "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion", described for all to see, to the Jew's horror, this tactic as well as many other tactics to rule and subvert the goyim by. Of course, Rachael would slam anyone, who quotes from it's text, an anti-semite, end of discussion and why? Because the Jews say you are. They censor what all commentators may or may not say so whether it actually comes out of a Jew's mouth or not is irrelevant since the goy that doesn't toe the line will never have his comments aired on the habitually pre-recorded programming we now get as status quo.

This, of course is how you knew the Russia Today commentator Jewess who quit on the air over the Russian invasion of the Crimea was conducting a staged event. She was "allowed" to say what she said and I'm sure it was pre-approved.

. In Protocol 19-2  it deals with a subject matter , sedition mongering,  that Jews have used for the last 500 years and continue to use when it suits their interest though in the next breathe, they will take the opposite tactic. In this protocol it is referring to a time when they have to reteach the goyim what is acceptable behavior and sedition mongering will be criminalized in the category of murder rape. They have to reteach them that because for the past 500 years they have been telling them the opposite because  it was in the Jew's interest to create havoc and pandemonium.

I do suppose calling out a government for the act of lying about grievous events for political gains of the privileged class does connote "sedition mongering". Rachael has clearly decided that she fully believes that "in a society based on lies, the truth is blasphemy. The fact that she colors her advocacy as "supporting all that that is decent and good" is but one more demonstration that Orwell's society that teaches what is "good" is "bad" and what is "up" is "down" is, to a certain extent, here much more than most folks realize. Here is the exact relevant protocol quote:

•  Sedition-mongering is nothing more than the yapping of a lap- dog at an elephant. For a government well organized, not from the police but from the public point of view, the lap-dog yaps at the elephant in entire unconsciousness of its strength and importance. It needs no more than to take a good example to show the relative importance of both and the lap-dogs will cease to yap and will wag their tails the moment they set eyes on an elephant.

• In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crime we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse in its conception of this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt.

•  We have done our best, and I hope we have succeeded to obtain that the goyim should not arrive at this means of contending with sedition. It was for this reason that through the Press and in speeches, indirectly - in cleverly compiled schoolbooks on history, we have advertised the martyrdom alleged to have been accredited by sedition-mongers for the idea of the commonweal. This advertisement has increased the contingent of liberals and has brought thousands of goyim into the ranks of our livestock cattle.

Please notice that in the last part of that quote it makes it extremely clear that this behavior, encouraged through the press for centuries in order to undermine goyim society, was considered "heroic" and that they need to redefine it once they are in full control. This is why the protocols is such a must read document. It tells you in the first 3/5ths of the text how they disrupt society in order to take control  and then in the last part, how they must walk back and redefine everything once they have it. Rachel was acting out classic sedition mongering demonization of a Jewish power structure in control enough to begin applying this technique.events for political gains of the privileged class does connote "sedition mongering". 

Please notice that in the last part of that quote it makes it extremely clear that this behavior, encouraged through the press for centuries in order to undermine goyim society, was considered "heroic" and that they need to redefine it once they are in full control. This is why the protocols is such a must read document. It tells you in the first 3/5ths of the text how they disrupt society in order to take control  and then in the last part, how they must walk back and redefine everything once they have it. Rachel was acting out classic sedition mongering demonization of a Jewish power structure in control enough to begin applying this technique.